Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 934 F.2d 668 - Quives v. Campbell

Quives v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

934 F.2d 668 · 1991

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Salas v. Carpenter (1992), Duckett v. City of Cedar Park (1992)

23 federal appellate ·

300199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Siegert v. Gilley · Jett v. Dallas Independent School District · Augustin J. San Filippo v. United States Trust Company of New York · San Filippo v. U.S. Trust Co. of New York, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘[When a public employee has a legitimate entitlement to his employment, the due process clause may protect as property no more than the status of being an employee of the governmental employer in question together with the economic fruits that accompany the position.]’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failed at an analytically earlier stage of the inquiry into qualified immunity: his allegations ... did not state a claim for violation of any rights secured to him under the United States Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could not reasonably be charged with knowledge that they might be violating a clearly established right of the Plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.