Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2020
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · State v. Cassidy · Dyson v. United States · Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New York · Braham v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence that there is a psychological 'profile' characteristic of sexual abuse or sexual assault victims to prove that the victim in a particular case fits this profile, and thus that the victim must be telling the truth when he or she claims to have been abused or assaulted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lch v. Ts · L.C.H. v. T.S.“it explained why [the complaining witness] might stay in an abusive relationship and place herself in situations where she could be abused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lch v. Ts · L.C.H. v. T.S.“explained why [the complaining witness] might not physically resist Russell's attempt to have sexual intercourse with her,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lch v. Ts · L.C.H. v. T.S.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.