Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 934 P.2d 377 - Ramos v. Conoco

Ramos v. Conoco’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Higley v. Schlessman · Lawton Oil & Refining Co. v. Nichols · Fowler v. Titus Manufacturing Co. · Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Delaney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Petition for Review to the three-judge panel alleging error of both law and fact with specific reference to the paragraph of the trial court's order . sufficiently specific to preserve the issue, not only for three-judge panel review, but also for review by this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.