Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 934 P2D 877 - People v. Elsbach

People v. Elsbach’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2013

6 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Minnesota v. Murphy · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · State v. Fuller · People v. Walker · People v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the trial court on remand determines, under the standards of Minnesota v. Murphy ... that defendant was, either implicitly or explicitly, threatened with revocation of his probation if he did not answer truthfully in the polygraph examination, then the motion to suppress must be granted and the judgment of conviction reversed. If the trial court determines there was no such threat, then the judgment of conviction shall stand affirmed, subject only to defendant's right to appeal that determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Ilf, as a condition of probation, a probationer is required to participate in therapy which involves truthfully answering questions designed to solicit incriminating responses, no Fifth Amendment violation cceurs unless 'the State, either expressly or by implication, asserts that invocation of the privilege would lead to revocation of probation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.