934 So. 2d 11 - Guzman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State · 477 So. 2d 553 - Hill v. State · Morrison v. State · 699 So. 2d 629 - Dobson v. State · 894 So. 2d 88 - Busby v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render a verdict solely on the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“can render an impartial verdict according to the evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.