Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 934 SO2D 269 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sandstrom v. Montana · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · Lewis v. Gober · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant used his [lone peremptory challenge] to excuse prospective [alternate] juror Rosie Foret. Since Foret was ultimately stricken, and the alternate jurors chosen were dismissed at the start of deliberations, the trial court’s ruling as to Foret had no effect on the verdict. Absent a showing of actual prejudice, defendant’s claim fails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.