Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · Guida v. Guida · 850 So. 2d 611 - Feger v. Feger · 545 So. 2d 428 - Trant v. Trant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, enhancement, and production of income or the improvement of, or the incurring of liabilities to, both the marital assets and the nonmarital assets of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The final distribution of marital assets, whether equal or unequal, must be supported by factual findings based on substantial competent evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.