934 So. 2d 659 - Brady v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 142 - Lowe v. Price · 389 So. 2d 610 - Florida Bar · 676 So. 2d 975 - State v. Woodruff · 704 So. 2d 197 - State v. Coble · 906 So. 2d 1258 - Lovelace v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On October 8, 2005, Brady was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and for possession of a controlled substance. Upon his arrest, Brady was issued a uniform traffic citation for the DUI offense. The ninety-day speedy trial period for bringing Brady to trial on the misdemeanor DUI charge expired on January 6, 2006. Six days later, the State filed a two-count information in the Pasco County Circuit Court charging Brady with possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: carisoprodol, a third-degree felony (count one), and DUI, a first-degree misdemeanor (count two). Brady moved to dismiss count two of the information filed in the circuit court. On February 6, 2006, the circuit court orally denied Brady's motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the information was untimely filed with regard to the misdemeanor DUI charge and that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over count two of the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“]The county court was never the best jurisdiction over the misdemeanor DUI charge and the circuit court never properly obtained jurisdiction over that charge.[”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.