M.T. v. Kierst’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dgn v. Sm · In the Interest of C. L. M. · In re C.R.K. v. H.J.K. · Gremli v. C.J.W. · In re A. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the minimum quality of care which the community will tolerate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re GC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.