Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

934 S.W.2d 30

State v. Claiborne

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-11-19

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2003

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2In this jury-tried case, Defendant appeals from his conviction for selling a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994. The trial court found that he was a prior and persistent-drug offender, § 195.275, RSMo 1994, and sentenced him to twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant alleges the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s motion to remove a juror for cause because its motives were racially discriminatory. Further, he alleges the motion court erred when it dismissed his Rule 29.15 motion as out of time. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

/934/sw2d/30 · .json · Public domain