Ramos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Martinez v. State (2000), Walter v. State (2000)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Mincey v. Arizona · Bumper v. North Carolina · Horton v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“justify a conclusion that the object of the search is probably on the premises.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pair v. State · Foreman v. State“(1) object sought to be attained; (2) circumstances under which the statute was enacted; (3) legislative history; (4) common law or former statutory provisions, including laws on the same or similar subjects; (5) consequences of a particular construction; (6) administrative construction of the statute; and (7) title (caption), preamble, and emergency provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marx v. State“Rather than requiring a determination to be made within the framework of a factual vacuum, the reviewing magistrate is permitted to draw reasonable inferences from the facts supporting the averments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elrod, Gordon Heath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.