Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 F.2d 1 - Forte v. Sullivan

Forte v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

935 F.2d 1 · 1991

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Kincaid v. Vail (1992), Loubser v. Thacker (2006)

15 federal appellate · 10 district ·

2101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Neitzke v. Williams · Hopkins v. Arizona Department of Real Estate · Mullis v. United Statescy Court for District of Nevada

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “general agreement that court officials ... who act at the behest of a judge or pursuant to a court order are entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity from suit as to those actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.