Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 F.2d 1015 - Terrell v. Brewer

Terrell v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

935 F.2d 1015 · 1991

Citation profile

368
cited by 368 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

106 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 368 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably State of California v. Campbell (1998), Farmer v. Haas (1993)

106 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

1580199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Estelle v. Gamble · Whitley v. Albers · Jett v. Dallas Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 368 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits [and] the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims per se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “made it extremely unlikely that [Queen] would succeed on the merits [of his claim].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[O]rdinarily, a federal prisoner seeking both damages and injunctive relief cannot bring a Bivens action until he or she has first exhausted any available administrative remedies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.