Unpingco’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive · Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co. · 1 Cal. 3d 586 - United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. · 21 Cal. 3d 671 - Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California Bank · 47 Cal. 2d 540 - Bennett v. Hibernia Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to explain what it is that Segundo Unpingco discovered in 1988 that finally put him on notice of the alleged fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“plaintiffs claimed that it was not until 1988 that Segundo Unpingco discovered the facts constituting the fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.