Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

935 F.2d 267

Docket No. 91-7551.

Stanley Joseph Callis v. Edward W. Murray, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 6, 1991. Decided May 31, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-05-31

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Anderson v. Hyatt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-05-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-603-R)

Stanley Joseph Callis, appellant pro se.

Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Stanley Joseph Callis seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Callis v. Murray, CA-90-603-R (E.D.Va. Apr. 3, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/935/f2d/267 · .json · Public domain