Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 F.2d 484 - United States v. Hooper

United States v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis

935 F.2d 484 · 1991

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
8
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Brown v. City of Oneonta (2000), United States v. Perea (1993)

40 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

600199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Sokolow · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the threatening presence of several officers; the display of a weapon; physical touching of the person by the officer; language or tone indicating that compliance with the officer was compulsory; prolonged retention of a person’s personal effects, such as airplane tickets or identification; and a request by the officer to accompany him to the police station or a police room.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “by means of physical force or show of authority,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.