Fahnestock & Co. v. Waltman’s Empirical Analysis
935 F.2d 512 · 1991
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. (1997), Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W.L.L. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc. (1997)
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'if a ground for the ... decision can be inferred from the facts of the case, the award should be confirmed,'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the arbitration agreements in those cases incorporate the rules of the American Arbitration Association which provide for an arbitration panel's award of 'any remedy or relief which is just and equitable and within terms of the agreements of the parties.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e have recognized that if arbitrators rule on issues not presented to them by the parties, they have exceeded their authority and the award must be vacated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.