Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 F.2d 832 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

935 F.2d 832 · 1991

Citation profile

324
cited by 324 later decisions
16
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

244 federal appellate · 5 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 324 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Johnson (1992), United States v. Duarte (1991)

244 federal appellate · 5 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 16 states

21901991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Washington v. Texas · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 324 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “origin of all funds deposited into a bank account to determine exactly which funds were used for which transaction.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.