Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 F.2d 918 - Sadler First National Bank of Perry County Indiana

Sadler First National Bank of Perry County Indiana’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · In the Matter of Russell E Sinclair Sr and M Marguerite Sinclairs · In re Gonic Realty Trust · United States v. Standard State Bank · In Re Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Other creditors would have better equitable claims than do the [debtors]. Preference actions are designed to achieve ratable distributions among creditors. Several lenders in addition to the [creditor] filed claims in the Chapter 13 proceeding. These creditors might be entitled to protest the dismissal and refiling that denied them access to any share of the cash realized [from reinstatement of the creditor’s lien]_ As things stand, the only claimants to the funds are the [debtors] and the [creditor]. Between the two, the [creditor] has the better claim: the [debtors] borrowed money that they have yet to repay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Sinclairs do not want to dismiss the case with prejudice, pay all of their accrued debts, and then file a fresh bankruptcy action that could go forward from the date of refiling. They want, instead, to file a Chapter 12 case that would be administered as if it had been commenced in 1985. This is conversion by another name.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.