In re Bowles’s Empirical Analysis
935 F.3d 1210 · 2019
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Teague v. Lane · Engle v. Isaac · McCleskey v. Zant · Atkins v. Virginia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.