State v. Classon’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2013
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McMann v. Richardson · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · State v. Pena
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant must identify counsel's specific acts or omissions that fall outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] defendant must overcome our pre sumption that, when viewing the cireum-stances of the case as of the time of counsel's conduct, counsel's challenged action or omission was sound trial strategy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In ruling on an ineffective assistance claim following a Rule 238B hearing, 'we defer to the trial court's findings of fact, but review its legal conclusions for correctness.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mecham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.