Hambright v. Hambright’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc. · 726 So. 2d 632 - Sampson v. Cansler · Sumlin v. Sumlin · 828 So. 2d 269 - Phillips v. Randolph · Royal Ins. Co. of Am. v. Crowne Investments, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' "[m]ere delay or increased cost is not sufficient to justify a refusal to set aside a default judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.