Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 935 So. 2d 354 - State v. King

935 So. 2d 354 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 398 So. 2d 1049 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant denies the allegations of the bill of information, the burden is on the State to prove the existence of the prior guilty pleas and that defendant was represented by counsel when they were taken. If the State meets this burden, the defendant has the burden to produce some affirmative evidence showing an infringement of his rights or a procedural irregularity in the taking of the plea. If the defendant is able to do this, then the burden of proving the constitutionality of the plea shifts to the State. The State will meet its burden of proof if it introduces a "perfect" transcript of the taking of the guilty plea, one which reflects a colloquy between judge and defendant wherein the defendant was informed of and specifically waived his right to trial by jury, his privilege against self-incrimination, and his right to confront his accusers. If the State introduces anything less than a "perfect" transcript, for example, a guilty plea form, a minute entry, an "imperfect" transcript, or any combination thereof, the judge must then weigh the evidence submitted by the defendant and by the State to determine whether the State has met its burden of proving that the defendant's prior guilty plea was informed and voluntary, and made with an articulated waiver of the three Boykin rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny individual subject to confinement in a state penal or correctional institution shall be committed to the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and not to any particular institution within the jurisdiction of the department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The use of the designation `Angola' at the end of the sentence was obviously used for emphasis only and was not in error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.