Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 F.2d 1050 - United States v. Young

United States v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

936 F.2d 1050 · 1991

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably United States v. Johnson (1993), United States v. Oliver (1995)

53 federal appellate · 2 district ·

600199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1501 (Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Whalen v. United States · Henderson v. Kibbe · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · United States v. Debrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in [the act] while engaged in or on account of the performance of his official duties, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Whoever, in the commission of such acts uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A court may treat a Rule 35 motion as one brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[was] not necessarily fatal to maintaining [the prisoner's] claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.