Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 F.2d 1092 - Emory v. Sullivan

Emory v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

936 F.2d 1092 · 1991

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably 16558a Hamilton v. Secretary of Health & Human Services of United States (1992), Washington v. Shalala (1994)

37 federal appellate · 6 district ·

680199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Bowen · John VARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee · Byron v. Heckler · Dixon v. Heckler · Tom v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether [her] findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record and whether [she] applied the correct legal standards.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[f]ailure to apply the correct legal standard or to provide this court with a sufficient basis to determine that appropriate legal principles have been followed is grounds for reversal.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'In reversing the Secretary's determination, it is within our discretion to remand to the Secretary for a further hearing or direct the district court to award benefits.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.