Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 F.2d 256 - Central Transport, Inc. v. Four Phase Systems, Inc.

Central Transport, Inc. v. Four Phase Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

936 F.2d 256 · 1991

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Nance v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2008), Ramsay v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1994)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

130199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co. · Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the issue in the instant case is the same as in the prior litigation; (2) the issue was litigated in the prior adjudication; (3) the determination of the issue in the prior adjudication was a critical and necessary part of the judgment in that action; and (4) the party against whom the earlier decision is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior litigation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the party against whom estoppel is sought was a party or in privity with a party to the prior action; (2) there was a final judgment on the merits in the previous case after a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue; (3) the issue must have been admitted or actually tried and decided and must be necessary to the final judgment; and (4) the issue must have been identical to the issue involved in the prior suit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.