Lund v. Albrecht’s Empirical Analysis
936 F.2d 459 · 1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2012
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. Summa Corp. · Nelson v. Abraham · Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad · Arcadian Phosphates, Inc. v. Arcadian Corp. · Brae Transportation, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a writing constitutes a final agreement or merely an agreement to make an agreement depends primarily upon the intention of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.