Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 F.2d 856 - United States v. Davidson

United States v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

936 F.2d 856 · 1991

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

66 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Bonds (1993), United States v. Sims (1992)

66 federal appellate ·

5401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · United States v. Ventresca · Raphan v. United States · Zerman v. Melton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “courts should not undertake a de novo review of the sufficiency of an affidavit, nor should they 'invalidate [a] warrant by interpreting [an] affidavit in a hypertechnical, rather than a commonsense, manner.' ... Rather, the magistrate's probable cause determination should be afforded great deference by the reviewing court.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The standard of review in this case is whether the magistrate had a substantial basis for finding that the affidavit established probable cause to believe that the evidence would be found at the place cited.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'the resolution of doubtful or marginal cases in this area should be largely determined by the preference to be accorded to warrants.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.