Schneider v. USA’s Empirical Analysis
936 F.2d 956 · 1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2025
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1709 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States v. Sherwood · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Neustadt · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A genuine issue of material fact exists only where 'there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kroggel v. Runyon“there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kroggel v. Runyon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.