Williams v. Glickman’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2018
2 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1691 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 7 U.S.C. § 1921 (Agricultural Credit Act of 1978)
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · United States v. American Trucking Associations · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Runyon v. McCrary · Ratzlaf et Ux United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Weighing the inconclusive legislative history and the statute's general statement of purpose against plain, unambiguous statutory language, the Court must apply the plain language of the statute and dismiss plaintiffs' § 1981 claim because the plaintiffs do not allege impairment of rights by nongovernmental discrimination or impairment under color of state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Hughes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.