Controlled Environment Systems v. Sun Process Co., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2014
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal Crafters · Bryant v. Ford Motor Co. · Bryant v. Ford Motor Co. · John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Central National Bank in Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“-it is not enough that .. total diversity may exist as to fewer than all of a plaintiffs claims, if they are joined with at least one nondiverse claim. Controlled Environment Systems v. Sun Process Co., 936 F.Supp. 520, 521 (N.D.Ill.1996) (emphasis supplied). In this case, each individual count of the complaint constitutes an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.