Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 P.2d 1221 - Beintema v. State

Beintema v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2022

18 state decisions

701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Frias v. State · Leppek v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A motion for judgment of acquittal is to be granted only when the evidence is such that a reasonable juror must have a reasonable doubt as to the existence of any of the essential elements of the crime. Or, stated another way, if there is substantial evidence to sustain a conviction of the crime, the motion should not be granted. This standard applies whether the supporting evidence is direct or circumstantial.’ * * * Leppek v. State, 636 P.2d 1117, 1119 (Wyo.1981).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““First, the record must be clear as to the incident which is alleged as error. Second, the party claiming that the error amounted to plain error must demonstrate that' a clear and unequivocal rule of law was violated. Finally, that party must prove that a substantial right has been denied him and as a result he has been materially prejudiced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Iclounsel may, as a matter of trial strategy, choose not to request a limiting instruction in order to avoid emphasizing the unfavorable evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.