936 So. 2d 1164 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · State v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such proof may consist either of evidence establishing that the accused had actual knowledge of the presence of the contraband in the place where it is found, or circumstantial evidence from which a jury might properly infer that the accused had knowledge of the presence of the contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When a case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, a special standard of review of the sufficiency of the evidence applies. The evidence must be inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence for the conviction to be sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he State is not required to rebut conclusively every possible variation of events that could be inferred from the evidence, but only to introduce competent evidence that is inconsistent with the defendant’s theory of events.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.