Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 SO2D 479 - Wells v. State

Wells v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 497 So. 2d 67 - McGilvery v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]ursuant to section 47 — 7—3(l)(d)(ii), a person convicted of armed robbery can never be eligible for parole, it follows that he may not accrue trusty or earned time pursuant to sections 47-5-138.1(2)(d) and 47-5-139(l)(e), respectively. It would be “an absurdity” were this Court to hold that a prisoner who is permanently ineligible for parole may be allowed to accrue earned-time credits and therefore receive the benefit of a shortened sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where a defendant pleads guilty to a crime, sentencing is within the complete discretion of the trial court and not subject to appellate review if it is within the limits prescribed by statute. Further, the general rule in this state is that a sentence cannot be disturbed on appeal so long as it does not exceed the maximum term allowed by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[P]rior to the enactment of section 47-7-3(1)(d)(ii), persons convicted of armed robbery could be eligible for parole after serving ten years of their sentence. However, it is clear that such felons are now completely ineligible for parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.