Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 936 SO2D 970 - Cockrell v. Watkins

Cockrell v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 859 So. 2d 1006 - Johnson v. Gray · 847 So. 2d 815 - Mabus v. Mabus · 493 So. 2d 952 - Rutland v. Pridgen · Martin v. Simmons · C.W.L. v. R.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The natural-parent presumption can be rebutted by a clear showing that (1) the parent has abandoned the child; (2) the parent has deserted the child; (B) the parent’s conduct is so immoral as to be detrimental to the child; or (4) the parent is unfit, mentally or otherwise, to have custody.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a)(i) In every proceeding where the custody of a child is in dispute, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it is detrimental to the child and not in the best interest of the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody or joint physical custody of a parent who has a history of perpetrating family violence. The court may find a history of perpetrating family violence if the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, one (1) incident of family violence that has resulted in serious bodily injury to, or a pattern of family violence against, the party making the allegation or a family household member of either party. The court shall make written findings to document how and why the presumption was or was not triggered. (ii) This presumption may only be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.