Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 A.2d 127 - Ares v. State

Ares v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although it is said that this Court reviews a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress under an abuse of discretion standard, more accurately, the trial court's findings of historical fact are reviewed under the deferential clearly erroneous standard, but its conclusion as to probable cause, or more specifically its application of the law of search and seizure to those historical facts, is considered de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.