Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 F.2d 1056 - Marsh v. Arn

Marsh v. Arn’s Empirical Analysis

937 F.2d 1056 · 1991

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Phelps v. Yale Security, Inc. (1993), Black v. Ryder/pie Nationwide Inc (1994)

50 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

7901991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · Bell v. Wolfish · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “both point unmistakenly to the unconstitutionality of the conduct complained of and be so clearly foreshadowed by applicable direct authority as to leave no doubt in the mind of a reasonable officer that his conduct, if challenged on constitutional grounds, would be found wanting.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In deciding the legal question of whether a reasonable official would have known that the alleged actions violate “clearly established” law, a court must determine whether the actions would infringe “particularized” rights claimed by the plaintiff. ... ‘[T]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.’ ... The unlawfulness of the action must be apparent when assessed from the perspective of an objectively reasonable official charged with knowledge of established law ...; the defendant’s subjective motives are irrelevant to the qualified immunity inquiry____”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the doctrine of qualified immunity is no defense to municipal corporations which may otherwise be liable for federal constitutional violations under [42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.