Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 F.2d 1089 - Smith v. Commissioner

Smith v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Thomas v. United States (1999), Harris v. Commissioner (1994)

23 federal appellate · 1 district ·

290199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7482

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Snow v. Commissioner · Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Commissioner · Rose v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ctual control [of the partnerships] rested in persons whose compensation from these partnerships depended solely on capital contributions, while they had interests in the profitability of competing ventures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “We find it error to have concluded on the facts and record that the Smiths were motivated by “no business purposes” * * *. [Smith v. Commissioner, 937 F.2d at 1098-1099 ; emphasis in original.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the legal standard applied by the Tax Court and its legal conclusions based upon its findings of fact are reviewed de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.