Oostendorp v. Khanna’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 1177 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2015
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jenkins v. McKeithen · United States v. Harris · Rascon v. Hardiman · United States v. Elizondo · United States v. Jungles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth [and to] avoid needless consumption of time....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the decision to admit deposition testimony is within the sound discretion of the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“manner in which deposition testimony is presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.