Rollins v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 134 · 1991
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Sawyer (1995), Gutierrez v. Flores (2008)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 7702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Carnegie v. United States · Bush v. Lucas · United States v. Fausto · Schweiker v. Chilicky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he merit-system principles include treating employees fairly and equitably and with proper regard for their privacy and constitutional rights”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“balanc[ing] the legitimate interests of the various categories of federal employees with the needs of sound and efficient regulation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.