United States v. Pool’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 1528 · 1991
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. Dixon (1992), United States v. Koonce (1993)
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 21 U.S.C. § 859 (§ 418 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Mistretta v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Burns v. United States · Kliewer v. New Jersey · United States v. Eichman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review factual findings underlying upward adjustments with deference, overturning them only upon a determination that the findings were clearly erroneous or without factual support in the record such that our review leaves us with the firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]lthough the gun carried by [defendant] was a plastic gun, the Sentencing Guidelines indicate that an object that appeared to be a dangerous weapon [should be treated] as a dangerous weapon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.