In the Matter of Mary Leasure Unroe, Debtor’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Stoecker Raleigh, In the Matter of Emil Stavriotis and Judith Stavriotiss Appeal of United States of America
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt · United States v. International Horizons, Inc. · In Re Jartran Inc Fruehauf Corporation · In re Longardner & Associates, Inc. · Landahl, Brown & Weed Associates, Inc. v. Longardner & Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Separate years imply separate tax claims under Bankr.R. 7015.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether the debtors and creditors relied on the earlier proofs of claim or had reason to know that subsequent proofs of claim would be filed; (2) whether other creditors would receive a windfall if the court refused to allow the amendment; (3) whether the creditor intentionally or negligently delayed in filing the proof of claim; (4) the justification for the failure of the creditor to seek an extension of the bar date; and (5) whether equity requires consideration of other facts and circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Brown · In Re Sage-Dey, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.