Northwestern National Insurance v. Alberts’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 77 · 1991
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2014
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Hackler v. Langenkamp · Acosta v. Louisiana Department of Health and Human Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interlocutory order granting a preliminary injunction is a judgment within the meaning of the rule 4(a)(4) provision relating to a motion under Rule 59 to alter or amend the judgment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“most substantive motions brought within ten days of the entry of judgment are functionally motions under Rule 59(e).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“include[] a decree and any order from which an appeal lies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.