Mathis v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 790 · 1991
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Soldevila-Lopez (1994), United States v. Sanchez-Barreto (1996)
17 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Preiser v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable probability that, but for the delay, the result of the appeal would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“but have expressly rejected the proposition that mere lapse of time is a sufficient basis for the granting of habeas. Id. We have ruled that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Elcock v. Henderson“[s]uch complaints, if unwarranted or brought with a motivation for delay, should not be grounds for [habeas relief]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Elcock v. Henderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.