United States v. 92 Buena Vista Avenue’s Empirical Analysis
937 F.2d 98 · 1991
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 19 U.S.C. § 1621 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Boyd v. United States · Kastigar v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania · United States v. 4492 South Livonia Road
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no property shall be forfeited . . ., to the extent of the interest of an owner, by reason of any act . . . established by that owner to have been committed . . . without the knowledge or consent of that owner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ll right, title and interest in property described in subsection (a) . . . shall vest in the United States upon commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he term 'owner' should be broadly interpreted to include any person with a recognizable legal or equitable interest in the property seized.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.