Warren v. Melville’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2019
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Carter · Gentile v. Altermatt · Pinnick v. Cleary · Manzanares v. Bell · Washington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Utah's no-fault statute does not abrogate all remedies for general damages.... Instead, the statute only bars a cause of action for general damages if the plaintiff fails to meet the threshold requirements”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a. Provides for recouping pecuniary losses by mandating recovery of all special damages b. Places a reasonable dollar limit on the general damage monetary threshold to accomplish the statute's objectives.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We recognize that under the open courts provision, a reasonable alternative remedy is required, but this does not amount to an exact equation of remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.