Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 So. 2d 1279 - Reddick v. State

937 So. 2d 1279 - Reddick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · 698 So. 2d 248 - State v. Bowen · 626 So. 2d 655 - State v. Young · 850 So. 2d 680 - McKinney v. State · Beaton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The standard of review applicable to trial court rulings on motions seeking the right to self-representation in a criminal trial is abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the trial court can and should inform the defendant of the potential perils and pitfalls of self-representation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.