Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 So. 2d 180 - Gregory v. State

937 So. 2d 180 - Gregory v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 424 So. 2d 726 - Florida Bar v. Merwin · 271 So. 2d 148 - Kilgore v. State · 636 So. 2d 869 - Garramone v. State · 705 So. 2d 102 - Wright v. State · KK v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law applicable to his or her theory of defense where there is any evidence to support it, no matter how weak or flimsy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not the quantum or the quality of the proof as to self-defense that determines the requirement for giving the charge. If any evidence of a substantial character is adduced ... the element of self-defense becomes an issue, and the jury, as the trier of the facts, should be duly charged as to the law thereon, because it is the jury’s function to determine that issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Where a defendant is charged with burglary, a jury could find that the defendant had no criminal intent upon entering but subsequently formed the intent to commit an offense, such as, in this case, battery. In this situation, the defendant has committed a trespass and a battery but not a burglary. A defendant is entitled to have the jury determine when the intent was formed and consider the alternative of convicting of both component offenses, rather than burglary or just one of the component offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.