937 So. 2d 419 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 847 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Love · 376 So. 2d 136 - State v. Reaves · Gray v. King · 913 So. 2d 843 - State v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prescription is the real issue in this case. When the trial court properly issued the alias capias on October 28, 2010, due to the defendant’s failure to appear, the time limitation imposed upon the State under La.C.Cr.P. art. 578 was interrupted. La.C.Cr.P. art. 579. When the trial court recalled the alias capias on October 4, 2011, the two-year time limitation established by La.C.Cr.P. art. 578 began to run anew. Id. Under Art. 578, the State has two years from October 4, 2011, until October 4, 2013, in which to bring the defendant to trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.