Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 SO2D 563 - Henry v. State

Henry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he record is clear that Henry was adamant that trial counsel not rely on any evidence of intoxication or addiction in Henry's defense, in either the guilt or penalty phases. "When a defendant preempts his attorney's strategy by insisting that a different defense be followed, no claim of ineffectiveness can be made."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`When evaluating claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate or present mitigating evidence, this Court has phrased the defendant's burden as showing that counsel's ineffectiveness `deprived the defendant of a reliable penalty phase proceeding.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`[T]he reasonableness of counsel's actions may be determined or substantially influenced by the defendant's own statements or actions.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.